Court was June 17th.
This was both a merits hearing for dad (because he had not shown up the first two times, but court was continued due to the fact that he had a lawyer there), and a permanency planning hearing (to determine what the long-term case plan is).
As far as the merits hearing, dad was present (maybe not of his own will) and did not contest that DSS was not offering him a treatment plan. However, they did stipulate that dad could complete treatment on his own.
As far as permanency planning, DSS recommended the permanency goal be changed to TPR and adoption. Both parents contested that. Because it was contested, now there has to be a permanency planning TRIAL for both sides to present testimony and the judge to decide what the permanency plan should be. (As of right now, I have not heard a trial date.)
* I did not know that there was a separate permanency planning HEARING and TRIAL. I do remember a note on one of the previous court notices for another child, saying, "This is scheduled for 15 minutes. Any contested matters will be continued for trial." I will say that every time I go to court, I seem to learn something new. At some point when I feel like I know enough to do so, I want to write a post summarizing the legal process and all of the things that can happen. *
And in the midst of the discussion about permanency planning, the bomb was dropped. Elmer's mom has named two more relatives that need to be investigated to see if they are feasible placements. Ugh. Where were these relatives nine months ago?! My guess is that they were not willing to take him when there was potential for him to have issues, and now that he is "fine", they are okay with it. (Or I hope - selfishly - that maybe they are still not okay with it, and mom is just trying to buy time.)
And it's now a month later, and I haven't heard any more information one way or the other about these other two relatives - if home studies have been completed, what the results were if they have, or if they have declined home studies (as at least one of the other relatives in the past did).
No comments:
Post a Comment